Tools: Display XY Data, Add Field/Calculate Field, Merge, Definition Query, Average Nearest Neighbor, Mean Center, Standard Distance, Directional Distribution, Spatial Join, Optimized Hotspot Analysis
Objective: the purpose of this project was to understand the spatio-temporal variability of crime occurrences in Austin, Texas by performing spatial analyses such as nearest neighbor analysis, mean center, standard distance, and directional distribution. I also use spatial joins to calculate crime density and conduct an optimized hot spot analysis to identify statistically significant crime clusters.
For this project, I specifically conducted analysis on theft and aggravated assault data.
Findings:
Average Nearest Neighbor: Measures how clustered or dispersed points are by comparing the observed mean distance between points to the expected mean distance.
The ANN for theft ranged from 0.34 to 0.38 and the ANN for aggravated assault ranged from 0.51 to 0.55, indicating clustering.
Mean Center: The geographic center of a set of points.
Based on the mean centers, the most of these crime incidents occurred in downtown Austin - northwest, north, and east of the UT Austin campus.
Standard Distance: Measures the spread of points around the mean center, indicating how dispersed the incidents are.
The standard distances for theft and aggravated assault was around 0.093 and 0.098 decimal degrees respectively, or around a 5.5 mile spread.
Directional Distribution: Shows the direction and spread of points, capturing the dominant orientation of the crime incidents.
The directional distributions for both crimes tell us there is a north-south pattern in the same direction as major highways, such as I-35 and Mopac expressway.
I created crime density maps by joining the Austin crime data to the census tracts shapefile. I then created a crime density field, calculated the crime density for each census tract (crime count / population), and symbolized the layer.
To compare the crime density changes within the two years, I joined the two shapefiles and subtracted the 2017 crime density from the 2018 crime density.
The results showed that 130 census tracts (34.48%) had no change in crime density, 142 (37.67%) census tracts had an increase in crime density, and 105 (27.85%) census tracts had a decrease in crime density.
The image to the right shows the density difference symbolized. You can see there is a noticeable decrease in crime in southern and central Austin, an increase in crime in the peripheral areas around Austin, and both an increase and decrease in crime in north Austin.
Hotspot Analysis: Identifies statistically significant clusters of high or low values, or "hot spots" and "cold spots." Hotspots indicate areas where crime incidents are significantly higher than in surrounding areas, while cold spots indicate significantly lower incidents.